Search for: All records

There has been a recent interest to develop and standardize Robust Authenticated Encryption schemes. NIST, for example, is considering an Accordion mode for (wideblock) tweakable blockcipher, with Robust AE as a primary application. At the same time, recent attacks and applications suggest that encryption context needs to be committed. Indeed, committing security is also a design consideration in Accordion mode. In this work, we give a modular solution for this problem. We first show how to transform any wideblock tweakable blockcipher TE to a Robust AE scheme SE that commits just the key. The overhead is cheap, just a few finite-field multiplications and blockcipher calls. If one wants to commit the entire encryption context, one can simply hash the context to derive a 256-bit subkey, and uses SE on that subkey. The use of 256-bit key on SE only means that it has to rely on AES-256 but doesn't require TE to have 256-bit key. Our approach frees the Accordion designs from consideration of committing security. Moreover, it gives a big saving for several key-committing applications that don't want to pay the inherent hashing cost of full committing. 

The increasing harms caused by hate, harassment, and other forms of abuse online have motivated major platforms to explore hierarchical governance. The idea is to allow communities to have designated members take on moderation and leadership duties; meanwhile, members can still escalate issues to the platform. But these promising approaches have only been explored in plaintext settings where community content is public to the platform. It is unclear how one can realize hierarchical governance in the huge and increasing number of online communities that utilize end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) messaging for privacy. We propose the design of private, hierarchical governance systems. These should enable similar levels of community governance as in plaintext settings, while maintaining cryptographic privacy of content and governance actions not reported to the platform. We design the first such system, taking a layered approach that adds governance logic on top of an encrypted messaging protocol; we show how an extension to the message layer security (MLS) protocol suffices for achieving a rich set of governance policies. Our approach allows developers to rapidly prototype new governance features, taking inspiration from a plaintext system called PolicyKit. We report on an initial prototype encrypted messaging system called MlsGov that supports content-based community and platform moderation, elections of community moderators, votes to remove abusive users, and more. 

User reporting is an essential component of content moderation on many online platforms--in particular, on end-to-end encrypted (E2EE) messaging platforms where platform operators cannot proactively inspect message contents. However, users' privacy concerns when considering reporting may impede the effectiveness of this strategy in regulating online harassment. In this paper, we conduct interviews with 16 users of E2EE platforms to understand users' mental models of how reporting works and their resultant privacy concerns and considerations surrounding reporting. We find that users expect platforms to store rich longitudinal reporting datasets, recognizing both their promise for better abuse mitigation and the privacy risk that platforms may exploit or fail to protect them. We also find that users have preconceptions about the respective capabilities and risks of moderators at the platform versus community level--for instance, users trust platform moderators more to not abuse their power but think community moderators have more time to attend to reports. These considerations, along with perceived effectiveness of reporting and how to provide sufficient evidence while maintaining privacy, shape how users decide whether, to whom, and how much to report. We conclude with design implications for a more privacy-preserving reporting system on E2EE messaging platforms.